What this type of stuff suggests is that Mark is doing this on his own. I don’t believe he has a lawyer helping him with this…because they NEVER would have allowed the Form 10 to be filed without the Financials and stay as his “counsel”
And I also suspect that the “advice of counsel” he referenced in deciding to withdraw the Form 10…was not “counsel” but rather the inevitable letter he would have gotten from the SEC pointing out that it was materially deficient and likely suggesting he withdraw it.
Marks history makes it abundantly clear that he has a troubled relationship with the truth.
Which might beg the question…. is there really an audit going on? And while that might seem like a stupid question, in Mark’s case his history suggests it might be a valid one.
And unless those spots have changed he is going to run into exactly the same issues he has over the last dozen years.