Once again, most Americans understand what it takes to make a journey to freedom. To give up everything and come to America, where we have a country with some people like you who do their best to make it even more difficult.
LOL, "imperious sanctimony." I'd say you have no justification for labeling me as self-righteous. YOU on the other hand. Then you pull out dated and debunked disparagement i've been hit with by American conservatives for 16 years here. Thought it had disappeared, forgetting we could usually count on you to bring invalid 'attack the messenger' bullshit back. Then you toss in a dated and boring strawman distraction, your open border reference. How many times have you used that false furphy. Difference this time you toss it in as suggestion for Australian immigration policy. You do that with the full knowledge that no country in the world has an "open border", even though you repeatedly have stated the United States has one. Not bright is it. Then you toss in a 2nd strawman re asylum seekers. No one here has suggested that every asylum claim should be accepted at face value, again, anywhere in the world. So that a 2nd disingenuous strawman tack of yours there. See your:
"Spare us all from your imperious sanctimony, fuagf. You lie in Australia. You do not see--in person--what this migration is doing to our country. May I propose that Australia open its borders to human and drug trafficking? Accept everyone declaring they are seeking asylum at face value and be released into YOUR general society until some future asylum hearing. P - But, alas, Australia has a natural "wall"--- the ocean-- that prevents this disaster happening inthe Land of Oz."
Yep. Australia is an island. Well done conix you got that right. Then you say the ocean prevents the "disaster", yet before you were critical of Australian immigration policy so the ocean obviously does not prevent anything. Of course it does help, you said prevent. As for your "disaster." It's not..
because, though not easy over decades (through terms of many presidents) America has coped.
Back to your accusation of my being self-righteous in saying that you were wrong in denying ALL of them the right they each have of being an asylum seeker.
Hey Ms "voted for Trump twice" who typically says "they are not asylum seekers" when she has no way at all of knowing how many of them are fleeing from gang persecution. or from political harassment. conix, When you continue to make statements with no consideration of truth or not you deserve to be labelled. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170835310
Well, you were told, by sortagreen, they all have a right to review. My comment to you was a fair one.
Again to your tag on me of claiming moral superiority. That totally wrong as you know - you know - i have posted much criticism of the Australian immigration situation over many years: Some here for you again:
There are many more. That's more than enough to negate you labeling me as you did.
To sum up: My reply to you was fair, and on the mark. Your reply to me was claptrap In essence, it did not deal with the content of my reply to you. Yours was accurate and basically only accurate on the the fact Australia is an island. Of course i have also posted that fact in public as being in Australia's favor re the refugee question. More than once in the past.
That post of yours done you may like to have a shot at this one. Wouldn't like to think you may have missed it:
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
