Whp, some folks on this board should learn that it's OK to be positive and supportive and still be critical. I agree with this totally. I have little objection from shareholders that post comments pertaining to their dismay on how New Visual is run. And to question their moves is fine, even if a bit indirectly painful.
Yes but; when you suggest that a banker of credibility, who receives an e-mail from you with the inflamous words someone alert the press - $300,000 - oh my gosh - they've struck pay dirt! how embarrassing . So he responds (obviously he is comfortable talking to you off the record from your relationship with him) , executive officer how could you let this kind of announcement go
out? It says , we are in deep do do and will take Green Stamps or discount movie coupons in exchange for equity - wouldn't it have been simpler to do a one sentence press release in bold letters saying "WE ARE DESPERATE _ MAKE US AN OFFER!" . Not only does this seem a bit wrong for posting his comments but it screams of being judgmental with the intent to harm.
I agree 300k is no PR material and to use this forum for discussion of New Visual is fine. Just seems you went a bit too far there…….
I know you’ve tried it before and were turned down , but if you truly care about New Visual coming around, rather than slamming NVC to this VC why not try to bring them together one more time.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
