Replies to post #58958 on Worldwide NFT Inc (WNFT)

[marcis]

Where does proving he got his shares legally come in on the matter.

Please enlighten with court request transcript or notes

I recall proof by the lower court. I don’t recall legally term used by the court.

Unless I missed that word.
Even so that’s not the lower court’s jurisdiction

[Yolo]

You are the one with the nonsense argument. Basically, your position is "the judge ruled this way so it must be correct!"

Keep in mind, it wasn't that he couldn't prove he obtained his shares legally. What happened was his first attorney screwed him over by not filing any evidence, and then the Reconsideration failed to get the judge to reconsider. Nowhere did the judge rule that he was unable to prove ownership or anything like that.

Also, let's review your original post...

The way you prove you bought something is with a transaction receipt of purchase, not that the shares were registered.

If I buy a car I can't prove to court that I bought the car by supplying the car's registration. I need the car title and bill of sale.

Do you know what transfers ownership of stocks, like a bill of sale for a car? A stock purchase agreement, like the one filed with the SEC:

https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=9135990&guid=T-P-kpE91w7-B3h

Also, right above the stock transfer agreement are two releases, which state:

RELEASE

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that Gary O'Flynn ("O'FLYNN"), for good and valuable consideration, including but not limited to the consummation of a share purchase agreement among O'Flynn, Patrick Corkery, GOFF, Corp. ("GOFF") and Warwick Calasse, in respect to the sale of shares of GOFF, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, agrees as follows:

That's legal evidence, no more is required.