Trump wrote a letter describing intent. There were issues such as at-the-pleasure of vs King of the World for Watt, un-firable by anyone preventing him until Collins cleared it up after the fact.
Obama, like Trymp also stated his intention "ensure that the shareholders cannot participate in future profits."
DoNot says: "slam dunk for DJT...."
Maybe DoNot could help Sandra Thompson and explain to her that Congressional action is not required as she has stated. Is it possible she is completely correct and "DJT" was also limited in the same way?
I am glad that you don't often pit Bush vs Obama because as the world turns, new information explaining much comes out:
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
