Replies to post #111444 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[VVVVVV]

Well, I can appreciate your enthusiasm but, it was only the three remaining companies in Waco, aka Amazon, T- Mobile and Verizon that we’re involved in the Markman Hearing, per the press release.

I believe it was Google that filed the IPR’s. But, shouldn’t make a difference who did. I’m sure the other one, will do the same,

And I don’t believe the thorn is out of VPLM’s back, yet. “Without prejudice to refiling after the January 26th status conference.” Not sure how this gets postponed. But, I’m all for it.

Not sure why, Danato Stayed the case and with the option to file another 101 Alice Motion. Obviously, it would of been better if he dismissed “with prejudice” and no mention of a January 26th date. Maybe he’s waiting for the IPR’s, to see if it’s instituted. Or if Amazon is granted a successful Writ of Mandamus.

Then maybe if an IPR is instituted, he’ll keep the Stay on, with or without Amazon. Which would be a complete victory for VPLM’s position with trial in May.

IMHO

[ButtersOnARoll]

Thanks Rapz! I was looking for those.

And then there's treble damages, which I think is a good possibility.

[Hay Day]

Rapz, as always “0n the mark” . I question if any of these massive infringement cases will ever make it to trial. My belief is that a first win would make a total vplm purchase price even more than prior to a case victory. We shall see. Anyway, thanks for your expert input.

[Stef07]

By the way, while GOOG and Meta were asking for venue transfer, they supposedly went through Markman hearing. The Albright's Markman ruling in favor of VPLM may be on the court records of GOOG and Meta.

They went thru claim construction with the other 3 defendants in Waco. Which should all have been the same definitions agreed upon, but Judge Albright never ruled including them, I believe he ruled on Venue a few days before the Markman Hearing. I may be incorrect so if anyone else can shed some light on this that would be great.