The CFPB case is relevant to the Plaintiff Shareholders lawsuit in the 5th Circuit and I believe that the Plaintiff Shareholders lawyers have amended their filiings to include the impact of the 3 Judge CFPB unanimous decision in Collins, didn't they?
So while CFPB and FHFA are two separate agencies, their enabling statutes BOTH had Unconstitutionally Insulated agency Directors and now they could BOTH have additional Unconstitutional Seperation of Powers issues related to bypassing Congressional authority over funding.
The federal government in their Petition for a Writ of Certerrori even mentions the funding mechanism for the FHFA at least once:
"And since then, Congress
has chosen similar funding approaches for, among other
agencies, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(FDIC), 12 U.S.C. 1815(d), 1820(e); the National Credit
Union Administration (NCUA), 12 U.S.C. 1755(a)-(b);
the Farm Credit Administration, 12 U.S.C. 2250; U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services, 8 U.S.C.
1356(m)-(n); and the Federal Housing Finance Agency,
12 U.S.C. 4516."
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
