Replies to post #740473 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

?
even when the coservator is guided by special legislation (not CH11 stuff) in a special law HERA

and such law specifically castrates the judicial system and says they can do nothing

I think this has been the court decision in 95% of the cases we lost ---- "we have no such power"

not saying that a "conservator" in most if not nearly all cases is subject to review by courts but here there is a special enabling legislation in HERA and an injunction in the words of HERA that says courts can not second guess the conservator

Such protection was FINALLY broken in one case where we went EN BANC and they said - on close vote --- courts can review where the actions are ugllllllleeeee

[Robert from yahoo bd]

A 15 year federal government conservatorship with the federal government taking BILLIONS PER YEAR IN PROFITS from Private Corporations is hard for the federal government to explain to the Judiciary but so far the Justices one-half of the Jurors in Lamberth's trial have been buying what Uncle Suggy is selling.

Let's see what happens with the Takings Cases.

[MoneyRobot]

Hopefully Hera is Unconstitutional because the conservator is the FHFA. The SCOTUS already ruled that the governance is unconstitutional and going forward the president can remove the head of the FHFA at will meaning the President can dictate if fnf should be released or not.

NOW, with the CFSB or whatever the letters are.....the funding to the FHFA might also be illegal. This is the big one and can challenge the existence of the FHFA because Congress under HERA states that the FHFA does not need to be funded by Congress like the CFSB.......go figure