Do you see how the 1984 Chevron decision sets up how ALL the courts are to answer judicial review of an agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers. It's generally been interpreted over the last 38 years as giving these bonehead federal agencies Directors wide latitude in their self selective interpretation of the enabling Congressional statute that gives these unelected buraucrats in DC power to f*k with American Individuals and Businesses, LIKE DEMARCO DID WITH US BY STEAMROLLING OVER OUR ECONOMIC RIGHTS AS SHAREHOLDERS.
NOW, post WV v EPA (decided 06/30/22), the SCOTUS is saying, if the federal agency decision (e.g., the FHFA's/UST'S decision to nationalize the GSES via the NWS) INVOLVES A MAJOR QUESTION RELATED TO NATIONAL ECONOMIC INTERESTS, THAT TYPE OF DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE BY OUR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES IN CONGRESS, NOT SOME BONEHEAD AGENCY DIRECTOR LIKE DEMARCO.
Does that help?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
