Replies to post #844 on CHRISTIAN STOCK INVESTORS

[VERITAS77]

I don't oppose scripture, I oppose the KJV and embrace the FULL scripture in it's literal factual unchanged translation. That which you deny and do not believe is inspired because it's not in the bible you read. I do not judge you for that, it's your right under your doctrinal faith and you should stick with it. But the same goes for me.-qoute

Jesus said that if all the things that happened were written down, that it was supposed the very earth itself could not contain it.
so............who is more presumptious here???

Me-excepting ONE GOD, ONE FAITH , ONE TRUTH, ONE BIBLE
or
YOU (whomever) SAYING A PREREQUISITE to FULL REVELATION IS TO HAVE ALL OF "IT"........JESUS just told us the entire world could not contain it.

P.S.... For an apostolic type believe, its ironic you talk openly against females.
THE PENTACOSTAL "MOVEMENT" IS FULL OF WOMAN PREACHERS... PUT THERE BY MEN.!!!!
WHICH PROOVES (IN YOUR OWN WORDS) THAT THOSE <<<< MEN, ARE NOT EVEN WALKING IN THE HOLY SPIRIT.

WORDS TO CONSIDER.

RISK....I do study.........A LOT , my friend.

[WardOffMonkey]

Risk, where do you draw the line on what's "inspired" and what's not? You could argue that L. Ron Hubbard was inspired to write Dianetics, and I think he was, but definitely not by God. So where do you draw the line?