News Focus
News Focus
icon url

5bagger

11/02/22 5:02 PM

#738816 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #738812

I don't see a table here

https://ypfsresourcelibrary.blob.core.windows.net/fcic/YPFS/FannieMae_10-k_0.pdf

Those few pages around 29 do talk about SHs rights. A little further down, it talks about SHs not being able to but does contemplate an end to c-ship.

"Accordingly, existing common shareholders have no assurance that, as a group,
they will be able to control the election of our directors or the outcome of any other vote after the conservatorship ends."
icon url

stoxjock

11/02/22 5:11 PM

#738820 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #738812

Ok, Thanks for that info. It is hopeful in one way for us as at least they seem to be deliberate about the process and I hope they haven't bought into the Gubmint's argument that the Plaintiffs are all about the Hedge Funds trying to make off like Bandits with supposedly "Gubmint" money.
icon url

Ace Trader

11/02/22 7:02 PM

#738839 RE: Robert from yahoo bd #738812

Very good Robert, and Thankyou for being in court this past 2 weeks.

Jury’s wanting a table of the responsibilities of the FHFA before and after !
Quote :……………
Well I think they specifically wanted a table referencing the goals and responsibilities of the FHFA to the shareholders before and after the Conservatorship
End Quote: ………..

That would show both Fannie and Freddie paying a 10% dividend with funds left over to pay down the $191 billion.

After the NWS, Fannie and Freddie’s 100% all went to treasury!

That there should be very clear !!!! To see what shareholders would have with future dividends after being release from conservatorship before the NWS.

I’m happy that the judge sent them back to keep hashing it out and not rush !!!!