$1.6 bn is all we need because it is going to be appealed - more important is we need is a small victory and admissions of fact under oath that could be deemed relevant in other trials. We have evidence of arbitrary and unreasonable actions by an unappointed Director of an unconstitutionally structured agency. We need a judgement in our favor and the amount really does not matter much at this point because it will be appealed. Dont you expect an appeal? Dont you think the best case to win on appeal is a smaller judgement and $ 1.6 bn seems more than reasonable under these facts and circumstances?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
