Your linked articles disprove nothing. The 1st is an opinion only, not supported by any scientic evidence. The 2nd is at odds the already revealed science, proven in the article I posted. The 3rd dismisses a gov't claim and still show no evidence that the science is flawed.
I'll need something more concrete then the unsupported opinions of those who haven't done thwe scientic studies.
I already debunked Peafunk's reply twice. I think the ball is in your court. PROVE THE SCIENCE IS FLAWED WITH SCIENCE THAT IS CREDIBLE.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
