News Focus
News Focus
icon url

hopester

10/30/22 4:41 PM

#50420 RE: peafunke #50416

THAT ARTICLE IS NOT SHARED BY THE MAJORITY OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE COMPILED.
INVESTMENTS SUCH AS THE ONES IN BECCS ARE NOT MADE ON WHIMS. BUT SCATTERBRAIN ARTICLES SOMETIMES ARE.
THE METHOD HAS SHOWN EFFICACY. ITS NOT A THEORY LIKE FCEL'S NET CARBON ZERO WITH EXXON............ 8 YEARS AND COUNTING!
icon url

hopester

10/30/22 5:34 PM

#50422 RE: peafunke #50416

Here's an article written in 2016 and here's an excerpt from it:
More than a theory now:
"BECCS has gone from a highly theoretical proposalearning carbon credits to being a key negative emissions technology promoted by the IPCC ( Intergovernmental panel on climate change) showing the world could avoid dangerous climate change in this century."
The article shows clear evidence supported by scientists and governments that its not a theory but is an acceptable endorsed method of reducing or eliminating CO2.
BECCS IS INDEED AN ALTERNATIVE METHOD TO FCEL and its unproven, unscientifically supported product. So are several others!!!
https://www.carbonbrief.org/beccs-the-story-of-climate-changes-saviour-technology/