Replies to post #737265 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Fanatical Infidel]

You don't also think the defense will play the "highest court in the land validated the NWS past, present, and future..." card?

I believe plaintiffs filed a motion for D's not to speak of Collins and it was granted...

[Louie_Louie]

Highest court in the land was absolutely not privy to the facts coming out here, so I have no doubt that their ruling can be re-challenged, based on what the outcome is here. The SCOTUS will look at their ruling much like Lamberth is looking at his past ruling now, a whole lot more skeptical (pun intended) in government defense terms...they were essentially lied too on the whole premise of this and sided with govenment based on an assumption that government ALWAYS does the right thing, just like Lamberth was, which we are seeing exposed as the big lie that every taxpayer knows that it is.