Ye missed my point eco.....its not about the manipulation of the results by the trial company to ensure the approval of their drug, thats to be expected.
Its about govt officials tasked with setting policy for everyones benefit using said flawed trial results as justification to "force" so called remedies upon an unsuspecting population.
That the use of flawed data should NEVER be the basis for setting any policy, much less one that affects every nation worldwide.
Ive stated several times, and even provided a chart from the WEF website (yes that WEF) that theres a reason why every previous "novel" vaxx took between 10-30 years to develop and become approved for mass usage.
The levels of reported (and projected unreported), life altering adverse events suffered by previously healthy individuals is shocking to the conscience, which mind you is totally avoided by the Media, BP, Medical Establishment and Government cabal..
Under any other circumstances those shots would have never seen the light of day but declaring a PANDEMIC opened the floodgates and as such here we are.
This final act of this story is yet to be seen but possible glimpses that something is seriously amiss may already be surfacing worldwide, particularly where mRNA tech was heavily deployed.
Absolutely not claiming 80, 50, 30, 10 or even 5% of persons vaxxed will encounter any or major problems but rather that the number will be substantial enough to be sickening.
I truly pray this is not the case..............we shall see.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
