Replies to post #734013 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Rodney5]

kthomp19 said, Quote: "Yes, that would be a consequence of the senior-to-common conversion. But neither FHFA nor Treasury has a fiduciary duty to shareholders, as multiple judges have ruled. They have no reason to try and prevent this dilution." End of Quote

I believe the FHFA and Treasury has a duty of ethics to the shareholders. We are American Citizens with Constitutional Rights. And everyone that has studied the facts know the 5th Amendment to the Constitution has been violated. We as a Nation have we removed all ethics from the business world? Why is it determined this cannot be settled were all concerned can benefit?

The concerned, Treasury, JPS Shareholders and Common Stock Shareholders.

[stockprofitter]

In fact, Treasury has a monetary reason to try and maximize it - AGREE - Government are LOAN SHARKS!

GUBBERMINT GREED TO THE MAX

[SREZ]

kthomp19,
Could you please go over what you think is likely to (ultimately) happen to the JPS of F&F and why? When this will occur, if possible?
Lamberth trial, Angel, Bhatti, Fairholme, 5th Circuit, et al.....
No PhD dissertation necessary, but by all means if the spirit moves you please go at it!
You are by far one of the best informed posters on the issues facing F&F.
Also, if you have an update on any unredacted Lamberth documents, would appreciate.
TIA

[SREZ]

Was the unredacted document made public from Lamberth, and if so, did you glean anything meaningful from it?
TIA