News Focus
News Focus
icon url

newmedman

08/15/22 9:11 PM

#421271 RE: hap0206 #421270

it's called due process dumbass. Look it up. Here in america we even protect assholes like you and your wanna be king.

even you as an 186 year old man can figure it out.
icon url

blackhawks

08/15/22 10:40 PM

#421280 RE: hap0206 #421270

Read it and, please, try to comprehend that the only reasons to want to reveal what's in the affidavit are to sabotage the case, expose sources, methods and witnesses.

Imagine that The FBI is closing in on Hunter or Clinton and it SHOULD make sense to you; make you feel real good too.

DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit

Source: CNN

(CNN) The Justice Department is opposing the release of details in an affidavit that lays out the argument that investigators made to a federal magistrate judge explaining the probable cause it had to search former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate last week.

In their new filing arguing for some continued secrecy, the Justice Department made clear the seriousness of the ongoing criminal investigation, saying it "implicates highly classified materials."

"Disclosure of the government's affidavit at this stage would also likely chill future cooperation by witnesses whose assistance may be sought as this investigation progresses, as well as in other high-profile investigations," the Justice Department wrote.

"The fact that this investigation implicates highly classified materials further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and exacerbates the potential harm if information is disclosed to the public prematurely or improperly."

Media organizations including CNN had asked for the affidavit to be unsealed after the search last week at Trump's Palm Beach, Florida, club and residence. The Justice Department said in its filing that disclosing the affidavit details "at this juncture" would "cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation."

"The redactions necessary to mitigate harms to the integrity of the investigation would be so extensive as to render the remaining unsealed text devoid of meaningful content, and the release of such a redacted version would not serve any public interest," the Justice Department stated.

NN, joined by The Washington Post, NBC News and Scripps, asked the judge last week to unseal all documents -- including any probable cause affidavits -- connected to the FBI search.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/15/politics/justice-department-mar-a-lago-search-affidavit/index.html
9
icon url

fuagf

08/16/22 5:52 PM

#421326 RE: hap0206 #421270

hap0206, Your unjustified attempts to create warrant equivalence is as laughable as your attempt to distance yourself from Trump and his enablers. You have consistently opposed our critiques of Trump, before and since his 2016 campaign. All of our positions on Trump were justified then and even more validated since. You have sat in opposition to every one. The asshole continues to be an overly self-centered narcissistic ego-maniac. The asshole continues to be interested basically in only power and money as instruments to complement his control of his world. The asshole has always seen himself as above the rule of law.

"Oh and by , and bye the way— Mexican stand off on the warrant Repubs want to know what was in application
for the warrant Dems want to know how he got the top secret intelligence Interesting times we live in
"

There in no standoff on the warrant. It was essentially properly arrived at. It was essentially properly executed.

You, in years as a loyal little GOP toady, have consistently questioned the integrity of law enforcement people doing their jobs if you saw them acting against your political interests. In this latest case, from the beginning

Right on the search warrant — wonder if it was the judge that signed the phony FISA warrants for the FBI
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169627477

Also again

- hap, Think. Knowing Garland as you should before now, why would he sign off on a warrant which
when unsealed could even prove to be of any embarrassment to himl? He wouldn't. Think about it.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=169657289

Why bring Mexico into it. Actually, there is no American stand-off on the warrant. Properly arrived at and properly executed. That's the situation there.

Now your people, of course, want law enforcement to compromise themselves and their ongoing operational
integrity by dressing an unreasonable demand - the unsealing of the affidavit now - as a search for the truth.

Search warrants are rarely unsealed. Here’s why.
The search warrant and “returns” filed in raid of Trump’s Mar-A-Lago estate will reveal little about the basis of the intrusion.
Brendan J. Lyons Aug. 12, 2022
Updated: Aug. 12, 2022 3:09 p.m.
[...]
Are the affidavits in support of search warrants ever unsealed?

Yes, but rarely while an investigation is ongoing — such as in the Justice Department’s probe of former President Donald J. Trump. The affidavits normally may be unsealed when there has been an indictment or a law enforcement agency has concluded its investigation and no charges were filed. In 2012, the Times Union successfully petitioned a U.S. magistrate .. https://www.timesunion.com/local/article/Records-detail-FBI-s-interest-in-Sweeney-and-2673467.php .. to unseal search warrant affidavits that had been filed in connection with the search of the offices of a lobbyist and former New York GOP chairman — an investigation that did not result in any charges.

Will the affidavit in support of the search warrant used to raid Mar-A-Lago be unsealed?

Unlikely. Although the Justice Department filed a motion to unseal the warrant .. https://www.timesunion.com/state/article/Attorney-General-Garland-Trump-FBI-raid-Mar-A-Lago-17367508.php?IPID=Times-Union-HP-state-package .. and returns — documents that Trump already has — it is expected the government will oppose motions filed by the Times Union and other news organizations to unseal any affidavits. The U.S. magistrate has also allowed the government to file at least part of its arguments for keeping the document sealed as an “ex parte” filing and under seal.
https://www.timesunion.com/state/article/Why-search-warrants-rarely-unsealed-17369233.php






..