Bud, I fully can appreciate and understand the need for operational liquidity BUT you need to ask yourself, GIVEN that Sandy has put up the money that we have given to him as shareholders to finance the operational expenses of TFN AND in return we ALL thought up till a couple of months ago that we are supposed to be entitled to 20% of TFN's revenue, then what is up with Sandy saying through his emails that TFN does NOT have to EVER give one penny to BKMP.
IF this fact is truly the case and TFN ultimately owes BKMP absolutely nothing, then what exactly does BKMP own?? Have we invested in a company (BKMP) on nothing more than FAITH that TFN will ultimately feel sorry for us and give us 20% of their profits. I am NOT that naive.
Sandy's history with his former companys that have ALL turned out to be worthless is now scaring the hell out of me.
I seem to remember that Wayne Rumbell once posted to this thread about a year ago a list of maybe 30 or MORE FAILED companys that Sandy has been involved with one way or the other over the years. When I saw that, I was outta here but RU convinced me that this stock (BKMP) was Sandy turning a new leaf but then again RU was posting here everyday something like AT and the OS was only about a billion shares at the time.
God, that seems like a century ago.
I just pray you are right and something, anything POSITIVE comes down the pipe next week and the news reflects in a higher PPS.
Steve
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
