Replies to post #100331 on Lehman Brothers Financial SA (LEHNQ)

[cottonisking]

LBHI's Debtors and Affiliates and Subsidiaries are paying their equity shareholders and subordinated claims ahead of our CTs Prospectuses' rights to be at the top of Holdings Global equity waterfall and many other Successors' rights.

Our Due Process demand that we enforce our rights.

SCOTUS changed the law in our favor on May 20, 2019 one month before our June 19, 2019 hearing. We are demonstrating the SCOTUS Ruling this year, per docket 61352:

27. The Movants have not met the strict, well-established standard for demonstrating
an entitlement to relief under Rule 59(e). They have failed to allege, let alone demonstrate, that
the Court overlooked controlling law which might have materially influenced the Court’s decision
to grant the Distribution Motion or that there has been a change in controlling law. Instead,
continuing their pattern of re-hashing arguments contained in prior pleadings, the Movants ask the
Court to again consider arguments that have already been fully considered and ruled on by the
Court. Additionally, in the Motion for Reconsideration, the Movants point to the pendency of
certain appeals (20-cv-05083 and 20-cv-05823) before District Judge Abrams as an alleged basis
for the Court to grant the motion. Even were this Court to consider this argument a valid basis for

This is the largest bankruptcy in the world so far. Now, we are moving in a straight line as opposed to a circle.