As one time an interested investor could read a science journal magazine and guess the direction of Mr. Zvi's research projects per Applied Nanotech. The goal was always to keep the doors open in Texas, etc... I've always thought that Mr. Fink is more pragmatically all around capable and capable of a springing a surprise with one particular patent that I won't mention. After what the company went through with Canon, it was an admirable piece of patent filing in my opinion. Likened to firing a shot across the bow so to speak.
I don't follow nearly as much as previously on technology topics. But just looking at the contract research SBIR topics, there is either the typical dead end stuff or something potentially is simmering under the surface--forgive my hype--that requires more that typical patent filing stuff--trade secrets?. At least the players will have a direct interest in all new filings. Wait and see. I could be wrong. Yes. I sent Mr. Fink a research topic link once this year. https://www.ans.org/news/article-3574/shadow-corrosion-is-reproduced-in-university-of-michigan-lab/ He thanked me.