News Focus
News Focus
icon url

want2retire

05/22/22 11:00 PM

#240669 RE: TRUISM #240665

“Some virtual boogeyman, infiltrated KBLB and was the cause for all their setbacks, with respect to lack of commercial production throughout the years.

Probably even the reason for Vietnam delay and switcheroo.”

Somehow this feels a bit dramatic. A former insider is now an outsider and not happy about it. They still feel they know what is best for the company. They were kicked to the curb and told not to call or write. Their input was no longer sought, if it ever was. Pretty simple really.

No reason to make something so simple sound so ominous and complex. Highly doubt this party really had all that much to offer in the first place.

Feelings get hurt, as someone noted before. Vengeance may be sought. So be it. Not everyone is able to move on after being told they are no longer wanted or important.

icon url

arachnodude

05/23/22 6:01 AM

#240678 RE: TRUISM #240665

Wow! That's a vastly different interpretation from where the story originated from. There was no "virtual bogeyman" as you stated. In fact, the story was brought up in relation to a real, current situation which there was a refusal to provide proof of the company failing to follow your "suggested protocols" and that is why the company failed in the scenario you provided. When I asked for proof it was not provided. Instead of providing simple proof I was directed to contact Ben. That must've triggered the memory M4N had. So, no, no "virtual boogeyman." Just a simple memory of another similar situation. Providing the ALLEGED proof of the "suggested protocols" rather than passing it off to Ben would probably have set this situation apart from the M4N memory recall. So?