News Focus
News Focus
icon url

XFundManager

05/08/22 6:41 PM

#36771 RE: XenaLives #36767

FYI - your response is a non sequitur aberration that is a cavil equivocation or simply erratum.

Scientific consensus is the collective judgment, position, and opinion of the community of scientists in a particular field of study. Consensus generally implies agreement of the supermajority.



They're for laboratory studies, individual research, academia, isolated scientific evidence or complied data is useless if the findings are not accepted by the scientific consensus.

icon url

boston745

05/15/22 2:00 PM

#36790 RE: XenaLives #36767

Disturbance of the immune system by electromagnetic fields-A potentially underlying cause for cellular damage and tissue repair reduction which could lead to disease and impairment

EMFs disturb immune function through stimulation of various allergic and inflammatory responses, as well as effects on tissue repair processes. Such disturbances increase the risks for various diseases, including cancer. These and the EMF effects on other biological processes (e.g. DNA damage, neurological effects, etc.) are now widely reported to occur at exposure levels significantly below most current national and international safety limits. Obviously, biologically based exposure standards are needed to prevent disruption of normal body processes and potential adverse health effects of chronic exposure. Based on this review, as well as the reviews in the recent Bioinitiative Report



I'm beginning to wonder if EMF exposure is causing some people to produce more auto antibodies causing the body to attack itself like seen in covid? That would better explain Dr Bilitys statement that Covid, by itself, is not the cause of significant disease and death.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19398310/