Although the Washington Times has an extreme right editorial bias, they report straight news with a much lower bias. Therefore, we rate them right-center biased overall. We also rate them Questionable and factually mixed due to poor sourcing, holding editorial positions contrary to scientific consensus, and numerous failed fact checks.
The Washington Times, although praised by conservative political leaders, has also been criticized for being the mouthpiece of the Unification Church. The Washington Times also has a strong pro-Christian bias, with a whole section dedicated to the Bible.
They have also published articles that criticize left-leaning Christians such as this: “George Soros and his ‘rented evangelicals’ outed by Christian leaders.”
In review, The Washington Times utilizes emotionally loaded language in their headlines such as “Gowdy puts Comey on blast after FBI ex-chief’s snarky ‘search for the truth’ tweet” and “NBC News’ Mika Brzezinski problem.” When it comes to sourcing, The Washington Times re-publishes articles from the least biased Associated Press and occasionally utilizes credible sources such as Refinery29.
In examining several articles, we found that The Times either does not source information or links back to themselves (internal linking) to information not relevant to the article. This article is an excellent example of internal linking: “Mueller: FBI did not mislead Flynn into lying.” Internal linking is a technique used to increase page views and improve SEO, increasing advertising revenue. There is nothing wrong with internal linking if the link relates to relevant information, but it does not in the case of The Times.
When evaluating how The Times covers science, we found they published an analysis/opinion piece by L. Todd Wood that promotes a climate change conspiracy theory: “global warming and then the climate change narrative was cooked up by America’s adversaries to enable our enemies to eventually dominate us.”
According to IFCN fact checker Climate Feedback, The Washington Times published an article with very low scientific credibility. However, when covering straight news on climate change, they report accurately, as seen in this article: “Trump admin releases National Climate Assessment with dire warnings.”
Failed Fact Checks
“5.7 million — that’s how many illegal immigrants might have voted” in 2008. – False
Taxpayers paid $4 million for President Obama to play golf with Tiger Woods. – Mostly False
Christ Church “ripping out” a plaque dedicated George Washington because it might offend people. – Mostly False
In passing H.R. 1 in March 2019, House Democrats voted in favor of allowing non-citizens to vote. – False
Then-Vice President Joe Biden publicly revealed the special-operations unit’s identity responsible for Osama bin Laden’s killing during a 3 May 2011 speech at the Atlantic Council Awards Dinner. – False
Did the U.S. Department of Homeland Security say that they fear illegal border crossings may increase the novel coronavirus spread? – False
Did Joe Biden say he attended college at HBCU Delaware State University? – False
A facial recognition software company identified Antifa supporters at the Capitol Hill riots. – False
Biden team won’t admit it, but the COVID-19 pandemic is over – False “COVID-19 shots are not vaccines” because they don’t “prevent one from becoming infected” – Inaccurate
Although the Washington Times has an extreme right editorial bias, they report straight news with a much lower bias. Therefore, we rate them right-center biased overall. We also rate them questionable and factually mixed due to poor sourcing, holding editorial positions contrary to scientific consensus, and numerous failed fact checks. (7/18/2016) Updated (M. Huitsing 01/08/2022)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
