Create an essentially worthless crypto/token..call it a "dividend"..
promote it as a reward for being a "shareholder of record" of one or both of two public companies also owned/controlled by the crypto/token creator..
then tell the shareholders of one ("parent" PBHG) they will also receive FINRA APPROVED shares of STOCK in the other company ("subsidiary" BDGR) at a rate of 2 for 1...
then when FINRA doesn't give the green light go ahead and award the promised crypto/tokens to shareholders of the "parent" anyway...
all the while refusing to file an official disclosure explaining all of the above --not to mention the billions in art that supposedly backs the value of these tokens and who exactly owns these art assets --their longtime owners or the publicly traded parent/subsidiary companies. And if not owned by and declared to be tangible "assets" of these companies, how can they be deemed to be "backing" these token/ dividends?
and if the tokens are essentially worthless then isn't the art worthless as well?