No worries CB ... although you are quite adept at not answering questions after being provided factual information and your typical response is not to answer and then say you are done.
I provided a document that comes from the same case regarding Svorai and CATV that the detentuon hearing information case is on. Is that document not relevant anymore? I provided the information where it specifically states that case was transferred to the 21-2054 case and lists the case number due to changing fron southern to northern district so it applies to the case. I provided the document that states the case is not related to the Vaccaro case.
I asked questions about your Grand Jury assertions to clarify your remarks. You answered nothing. I answered each of your questions. You provided no proof that the cases are related except that you think they are related because the case went to a Grand jury. That is not proof the cases are related.
That is ok if you dont have the answers or are unable to support your claims and remarks. I dont really need to prove the two cases are connected. Nothing ever said they were.
I am waiting for you to support your claim that CATV has been added to the 2019/20 Vaccaro case. As they say in the business ... the burden of proof is really on you to support this claim. So far you only provided because it went to a Grand Jury. And your remarks regarding how Grand Juries work do not add up. Feel free to clarify and explain.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
