You probably missed the part where I said the numbers are for illustrative purposes only.
Also the conversation is hypothetical... it's just to show how it COULD go down but not necessarily if it did.
But you continue to try to "force" that revenues be reflected in the share price, why?
We learned about past revenues with the PPP and that didn't cause a rise in share price... so why would any new revenue do that?
Just because we don't know about the numbers doesn't mean they don't exist and nor does it mean that the price reflects any of it
In fact, given that this stock doesn't trade for Americans and that short sellers in Canada can print infinite shares even a BILLION dollars in revenues might not be reflected. (The billion I just used right now is illustrative)
But, it would be reflected in Total's valuation should a buy out happen.
Krombacher
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
