News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Tiresias

03/27/22 12:46 PM

#148958 RE: E A #148957

Reminds of another denial. This time the picture can be replaced with DLM and J. The caption will read…”what!? My Lai?”
Even trusting investors here have to keep food on the table. So an amended 10Q or 8K explaining the discrepancy signed off on by the auditor and their lawyer and the company head should be enough to put the matter to rest.
icon url

PepsiMan

03/27/22 1:07 PM

#148960 RE: E A #148957

Two posts state no Form 4 was filed by DLM. Here is one of them.


https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=168336398


You don't file a Damn Form 4 if you haven't sold anything now do you. It sure reads like it was strongly implied. So you (NOT we) didn't state that. Great we have that cleared up. You made the statement regarding the shares discrepancy and have been asked to post what you are talking about. No? It obviously isn't that important then. Jeeze.

No form is necessary when shares are not sold. Filing Form 4 (101).

Again. My recommendation would be to contact DLM. No?

This back and forth discussion is obviously a lot about nothing.

So perhaps a 10Q or an 8K explaining the discrepancy should at some come out on this as another poster referenced that would clear things up? That would be the thing to do in this regard.

IMHO




$TTCM


PEPSI
icon url

stockyupydowny

03/27/22 8:21 PM

#148978 RE: E A #148957

Nope - if you need true clarity - reach out to the company and take some time to understand what is taking place - so much "guessimg" smh
icon url

stockyupydowny

03/27/22 8:28 PM

#148979 RE: E A #148957

If your ever not sure - if you need true clarity - reach out to the company and take some time to understand what is taking place - so much "guessimg"