A Response and an opinion.
BMoney23 I would choose to debate a number of points in your recent post about CYIO:
You wrote: "Do you want my response in MLA, CMS or APA? I’m assuming CMS since it came out in 1891 and we’re staying in the past and not moving forward with technology."
Axle writes: BMoney, since I was a small child I have always focused on communicating so that people of any age or education can have an equal footing on understanding what I say or write - so you would never see me write in cryptic formats such as "words like" MLA, CMS or APA phrasing - not because I don't know what they mean and the formats they represent - but like Mark Twain or Abraham Lincoln - the written word is meant to communicate - not to separate people or flaunt a false pride of education. And the statement of "staying in the past and not moving forward with technology" - couldn't be further from the truth - at least not for me.
You wrote: "Twitter is a reliable source for news and for companies to get news out fast. In this day and age, it is used by many, including many big fish in the game for news, sharing ideas, and charting plays."
Axle: - I believe Twitter to be an inferior communication tool - similar to the telegragh. Like the telegragh it is designed from its infancy to be highly limited in length and highly focus on only a very small audience unless "aimed" method. Twitter by its very design is for "messaging" and very unstructured - as a result it is a terrible media method for prospecting and is far too age and "follower" focused. CYIO needs sales efforts and prospecting referencing. Twitter is too diverse and too non-referral focused. If you look at the breakouts of who uses Twitter, why its used as it is by them, and their age breakouts - you don't find a beneficial mix IMO for selling/prospecting to gain investor's interest.
You posted: "Twitter is not the only site they have posted their pipeline on,"
Axle: but it is THE FIRST place and also the most difficult to find or be exposed to. So why do they use Twitter? because its "the cheapest cost" . . . what a horrible selling/marketing concept.
You postd:
"Some posters have NOT been accepting of the crypto route the company has took, and has adamantly said that they should’ve gone the hand sanitizing route. If they did, I’m sure we would be well below .01 pps. How many companies out there thrive solely on hand sanitizer? COVID is almost completely a back thought in the majority of the populations mind, so as focusing on sanitizer may have brought temporary success, it would not have set the company up for future success, as going through crypto route, imo, has set the company up tremendously for the future."
Axle posts: Sorry BMoney but you haven't established any logical pattern of how "crypto" has brought the company any success as yet. And I think if you examine a number of objections that developed to Helio's direction - it was about developing ideas on benefiting cannabis dealers and avoiding the banking system legislation - and that just never made any money but it sure alerted agencies.
We were in healthcare and covad related areas long before the merger - yet we never made anything from any of the effort - and we had a period of significant potential opportunity from summer 2020 to summer 2021 . . . we were not in a wrong area - we just didn't do any of the efforts that would have gotten us substantial public notice as well as money. But not in retail - in marketing to specific client opportunities. Also - the perception that covad is all done - is not logical. right now The President has been lobbying long and hard with Congress about needing another $30 billion just for those purposes. And China right now - is having the worst breakout issues they ever had.
My point BMoney is - you want others to give CYIO every chance and belief and morsel of patience that has still not proven out - but things that could have proven out bigger - you want us to believe were destined to failure. And my point is - if you don't try to succeed with real opportunities - then failure is virtually guaranteed. When financials come out - will we see considerable income from this past year ? The answer is likely no - but had we done what I was suggesting in this specific categories of sanitizers - I believe we would have seen considerable income action AND STILL been able to do whatever we're just finally getting started on the exchange and NFT.
I knew some of those special categories pretty well - they weren't small or insignificant.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
