News Focus
News Focus
icon url

wEaReLeGiOn

03/14/22 1:39 PM

#405804 RE: Zorax #405793

Are you worried that somehow if you spell the leaders names correctly, you'll suffer some onset of random people coming here to bash you, or is it just a 6th grade stunt/carry over from prepubescence?
icon url

fuagf

03/14/22 2:35 PM

#405816 RE: Zorax #405793

And if Russians don't get Putin themselves it gives people as myself yet another good reason to live some
20 years longer. To see Putin brought before the ICC facing war criminal charges. As Milosevic was.

Actually it's also yet another reason why the United States should ratify the Rome Statute.

International Criminal Court

[...]

Finally, the General Assembly convened a conference in Rome in June 1998, with the aim of finalizing the treaty to serve as the Court's statute. On 17 July 1998, the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court was adopted by a vote of 120 to seven, with 21 countries abstaining. The seven countries that voted against the treaty were China, Iraq, Israel, Libya, Qatar, the United States, and Yemen.[14] Israel's opposition to the treaty stemmed from the inclusion in the list of war crimes "the action of transferring population into occupied territory".[15]

[...]

Opposition to the Court

During the administration of Barack Obama, US opposition to the ICC evolved to "positive engagement", although no effort was made to ratify the Rome Statute.[23] The subsequent Donald Trump administration was considerably more hostile to the Court, threatening prosecutions and financial sanctions on ICC judges and staff in US courts as well as imposing visa bans in response to any investigation against American nationals in connection to alleged crimes and atrocities perpetrated by the U.S. in Afghanistan.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Criminal_Court#Towards_a_permanent_international_criminal_court