News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Jean Naymar

03/08/22 10:06 PM

#107403 RE: GMJDubbs #107402

Yes, but the Nasdaq is paid by SBFM to post that. There is no quiet period, what quiet period? #sarcasm
icon url

kingbee

03/08/22 10:16 PM

#107404 RE: GMJDubbs #107402

Facts like that don't matter, lol. They said it was a scam. They said we would never get to NASDAQ. They said that UGa was not participating in the studies. They said there would be no government funding. Now they say there is no quiet period.

Do you notice a trend?

We finally are on the right course. When the quiet period ends the science will be revealed and we will find our proper valuation.
icon url

TenKay

03/08/22 11:29 PM

#107405 RE: GMJDubbs #107402

The Nasdaq bots are frequently wrong when there is an S-1 involved.

The informal “quiet period” associated with an S-1 offering ends when the S-1 goes effective.

And material events don’t ever have a “quiet period”.
icon url

BlazingStocks

03/09/22 9:45 AM

#107451 RE: GMJDubbs #107402

Thanks for sharing that information!