Maybe it's naive of me to assume this, but I don't see how they can NOT review this ruling. It basically says that property rights don't exist for companies in conservatorship.
Originally, I think that SCOTUS abandoned us on APA because they didn't want to open a can of worms of questioning conservator power--they also may have figured we'd win on Takings--but their ruling is now causing other problems.
IMO, the words "or the agency" can not trump 5th Amendment property rights. If this is the case, one of the following must be true:
A. This ruling is wrong.
B. HERA itself is unconstitutional.
C. Property rights don't exist.
I'm betting A.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
