As you well know financials is not his strength, and attention to detail may or may not be, certainly for the Auditor to miss this is atrocious. Bottom line, if you look at the numbers, I think it was around 930K in salary, lots of laughs, the company didnt even bring in that much for the year. Like I said common sense, the numbers arent what one would normally interpret them to be. He hasnt taken any salary, just expenses.
Yes the footnote says he got paid towards accrued compensation. However, the numbers on the financial statements do not support the amounts in the footnote. I have posted about this previously.
The actual financial statements would trump the footnotes in terms of accuracy
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
