My point is it doesn’t make sense to me that, on the one hand, Barwicki would have claimed to talk to Roger, but on the other hand, deny knowing him.
I don’t know you, but I have communicated with you. If someone asked me if I know you, the answer would be a resounding “No”.
I can’t come up with anything that makes sense; it just doesn’t sit right with me. So….as far as I’m concerned I don’t believe ANYTHING that was said by Barwicki in that conversation because he either wasn’t telling the truth when he said he talked to Roger, OR he wasn’t telling the truth when he said he didn’t know Roger OR he wasn’t telling the truth in EITHER of those statements.