How do you know that the subpoenas are related to trading by company executives? The only thing the 10q says is that the company has received subpoenas relating to investigations. Possible that those “investigations” might be into activist short selling of CYDY, no? And if we’re to believe that the “investigations” are related to something the company did wrong, why was the company assured (as stated in the 10q) that the subpoenas shouldn’t be construed as indicating they did anything wrong?