News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #4574 on FACT-N-FICTION
icon url

LoanStew

02/03/07 8:09 AM

#4575 RE: sandvet #4574

Sandvet,
I am in full agreement with you. I, in the past, have even gone so far as to re-post someone's post, deleting ONLY the information that was the TOU violation, if I felt that the majority of a post contained relevant information.
I took a look at the deleted posts this morning, and noticed we got a visit from a poster named NOHYPENOBULL. You should know that this poster runs his own "Promoter" site (compensation is listed on his disclaimer on all covered stocks), and to be honest, I have to wonder if Matt is going to let him post here with that name, because the name alone is advertising. He has had it out for Iceman and myself because we have provided relevant commentary on several stocks, of which he has either been compensated to cover currently or likely has a substantial position (or else he certainly wouldn't take offense to information about a company that doesn't portray a positive light). While he is very knowledgeable about the market, he has chosen to attack posters rather than debate issues. I'm sure you, Ice, Heenster and myself have no problem with posts that are strictly discussing the company and why a point any of us may make is not correct, whether with factual backing (which I know we'd acknowledge if we were in error on a fact), or at least shown as an opinion (which every poster has a right to), provided it isn't answered by attacking the poster.
The stocks provided in the iBox are there to provide information about some of what is being discussed on this board. There are and will be more stocks...but the box will get insanely large if we put them all there. I don't think anyone here argues the massive dilution in GZFX. It's there, everyone has to see it's there. And I think all of us are in agreement that growth there MUST occur to slow that down if the company wants to succeed. They can't just keep issuing shares. They can, I guess, but it wouldn't be in the best interest of the shareholders who bought pre-dilution. IMO it's hard to see people actually still holding shares from a long time ago, more likely holding in the region of the shareprice now, maybe still down 40 percent or so. But that's my guess.
This board is for discussion, not attacks. Let's hope it can stay that way.
IMO/FWIW
icon url

Divine Madcat

02/03/07 1:04 PM

#4605 RE: sandvet #4574

What else is there to say? The website gets small change, and you guys start crying about dilution? No offense, but you do have to be stupid to jump to a conclusion like that. None of you people are actually looking at FACTS, like you say you do on this board. This board serves nothing but pointless bashing.

You seem reasonable sandvet, so perhaps lumping you in with the rest may be wrong. But i really think you need to take a step back, and just look at what is actually been happening.

If you really think the stock is being diluted like you all feel it is, then how are we holding the price we are. We are not a stock that can add millions of shares and not have a destroyed share price. Sure, we have had some big dips; at the same time, we have had big jumps. The buys and sells have been fairly well matched. A few big dumps have happened, just like a few big grabs have happened. This wouldn't happen if several hundred million shares were suddenly released.

Finally, i do take all this uneducated bashing personally- i got money in this(as does everyone else of course, unlike Ice...), and i don't need people posting flat out lies (ungag the TA? THEY AREN'T GAGGED!) needlessly hurting my stock.