Replies to post #43112 on FuelCell Energy Inc (FCEL)

[cabel]

You stated

Now they've ( EXXON) given them until April to prove their process.


Do you have a link stating this or is this simply your opinion?

[XenaLives]

AND THE B.S. IS REPEATED YET AGAIN... SAME B.S.

Alpha article shows FCEL continued to show the 2 terminated awards as Backlog after they were cancelled. It's found in BOLD Printin the article. The link provided gives all the details

Quote " These contracts were never in the backlog".
FALSE Its in the article and I prefer to accept their findings as Alpha is known not to come out with unsupported statements.

https://seekingalpha.com/article/4377623-fuelcell-energy-key-projects-underpinning-investor-hopes-appear-to-cancelled

The article says no such thing.

FALSE
Quote" there is no indication that fcel tech is not viable".
The word "viable" means capable of working successfully. After 6 years of trying to prove it does ( ie is viable) FCEL has not. Now they've ( EXXON) given them until April to prove their process. AT THIS POINT THEIR CC METHOD I NOT "VIABLE" AND MAY NEVER BE VIABLE.

Exxon would have cancelled the contract outright if FCEL didn't have the track record.

QUOTE " Professional Analysts have a crappy record"
FALSE
NOT WITH FCEL DO THEY HAVE A BAD RECORD. THEY'VE CALLED IT RIGHT DOWN FROM $29 TO THE CURRENT $6.00 PX. THOSE WHO FOLLOWED THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS WOULD HAVE SAVED MUCH FINANCIAL PAIN. IT ALL GOES BACK TO THOROUGH, UNBIASED RESEARCH. THE PROOF IS IN THE RESULTS 3 -4 SELLS AND NOT 1 SINGLE BUY.

All B.S. The post you are replying to cites historical fact that the "professional analysts" Were more bullish just before bankruptcy.