Salve, I think this is the answer Mike is referring to. Do you or anyone else think this is sufficient evidence that little bank is responsible for the drop in share price?
Absolutely. New market makers appear exactly 6 months after the private placement, ton of shares being dumped (for a loss), in the 70s/80s/90s? Why would shareholders who bought 2.00+ or 1.00+ be selling here? Makes no sense. What does make sense is Littlebanc is the ones selling. Furthermore, otcmarkets outstanding shares updated and no new shares. HOWEVER, the UNRESTRICTED share count went up. Just as we all suspected. Waiting game, then we fly.
Market Data 
Markets 
