News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jour_trader

11/18/21 9:09 AM

#362318 RE: kayak_wench #362315

Not the first time he has confused revenue with profitability. This would only be true if all the expenses (COGS, R&D, G&A, etc) could be swallowed perfectly by the acquirer. G&A & R&D could happen with maybe some savings on the COGS side as well, but no company assumes a zero cost structure during an M&A transaction.

This was not the only ridiculous comment made, but will leave it at that for now.

The doctorate seems to ignore basic financial and economic principles in LaLa land.
icon url

no2koolaid

11/18/21 10:34 AM

#362328 RE: kayak_wench #362315

kayak wench,

Thanks for the comments. I did not mean "Break Even" in the financial sense. If I did t would have posted some financial analysis as I did on this occasion...https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164387519

Perhaps, I should have caught my language in an edit but did not. Still, I find it interesting that an effort to provide a hypothetical example - one that would not happen - gets evaluated for the wording on the example rather than the point of the post - Elite' p/s does not reflect its value and it is manipulated.

Any comments on the manipulation link? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?