Replies to post #192727 on Cytodyn Inc (CYDY)

[Learning53]

Jimmy, Yes, Nader's taken a lot of heat for trial design - yet guess who's contracted to be the EXPERT in that. We've had Amarex since January of 2014 - no wonder nothing's ever gotten an EUA or an Approval. Coincidence?

IMO

[3X Charm]

Occam’s Razor to the rescue on Nader. He is the common them in all CYDY failures and the easiest point of contact for a bribe.

-Nader picked Amarex
-Nader said for years “ they do fantastic job”
-Nader demanded Amarex send in a short BLA
-Nader lied about the BLA RTF reasons
-NADER continued to use Amarex for CoVID trials even after failed HIV. Why didn’t he know how poorly Amarex was performing, or did he use them because of that incompetence to delay LL from coming to market? The Amarex question needs to be answered. When did Nader know what and why did it take so long to ascertain their incompetence if that wasn’t the agenda all along?
-Nader knew 4 doses should be used for CD 12 trials and used 2 instead
-Nader has proven his greed multiple times
-Nader fired Pestell without cause, yet he recently attributed any CYDY cancer success TO Pestell.
-Nader blew up any positive impact potential of the Pestell acquisition before any traction could be made costing shareholders $7.6 million.

The multitude of failures by one man in such a short time would appear unlikely to be accidental. Add in the recent revelation of the smoking gun letter seems to suggest Nader has been sabotaging CYDY all along. Can his greed be doubted????