News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Real McCoy

10/23/21 7:48 PM

#120656 RE: randomwalk007 #120655

Who/where is saying that anything would be held up by a class action? It didn’t hold up the SISP, the liquidation or Monitor discharge.
icon url

Jimmlu59

10/23/21 9:00 PM

#120657 RE: randomwalk007 #120655

I think it was exactly 69m
icon url

toncatmad

10/23/21 9:31 PM

#120658 RE: randomwalk007 #120655

I thought the debt was between $60-80 mil or so. It’s all in the monitors reports.
The class action isn’t holding anything up. You do not even need to own the shares you just have to prove you did during the timeframe. You don’t need to turn over shares.
The class action will close at some point and when nothing happens what will the next excuse be?
icon url

Real McCoy

10/24/21 9:12 AM

#120665 RE: randomwalk007 #120655

You’ve repeated your assertion that “it is clear” that the NY judge has to sign off before any “second transaction”. Can you explain how you’ve come to the conclusion that “it is clear”? I cannot imagine anyone affiliated with this in any way stating this.

When the judge does sign off, will you be able to resist the temptation to find another “clear” reason a completely nonexistent transaction cannot move forward?