Innovating into the future is one thing,
Corporate greed has an end point to it, Eventually you cant cut any more, can't find the ever cheaper labor etc etc
Options are given to avoid calamity but its just like options are given to avoid environmental calamity.....Its all up to us..
The controversial MIT analysis generated heated debate, and was widely derided at the time by pundits who misrepresented its findings and methods. But the analysis has now received stunning vindication from a study written by a senior director at professional services giant KPMG, one of the 'Big Four' accounting firms as measured by global revenue.
.......
“BAU2 and CT scenarios show a halt in growth within a decade or so from now,” the study concludes. “Both scenarios thus indicate that continuing business as usual, that is, pursuing continuous growth, is not possible. Even when paired with unprecedented technological development and adoption, business as usual as modelled by LtG would inevitably lead to declines in industrial capital, agricultural output, and welfare levels within this century.”
Better get that quantum computer fired up ;)
I tell the boys that people have been calling for the end of the world forever, lol....Y2k anyone! WWI, WWII, The cold war ;)
If society ever collapses it won't be the end of the world but it will thin the herd pretty good...