Fair Enough. I will wait until I see the entire context of that exchange to form any deeper assumption. I would assume that it will come out at some point. I would agree just that email by itself could definitely be interpreted as you described. I will re-read the Adar case later along with the exhibits.
I think we need to see the rest of the emails and the entire conversation. The media literally makes a living cutting up footage of interviews etc. To make things look one way and giving you a piece or snippets of a conversation and leaving the rest out which gives context and can make a major difference on perception. I would want to see the conversation before making that assumptiom.