InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MXAMDUD

10/12/21 11:49 AM

#378256 RE: zandant #378255

no one is naked shorting a .22 stock. MUCH MUCH more money could be made by pumping it upwards
icon url

sox040713

10/12/21 4:16 PM

#378283 RE: zandant #378255

There are three powerful forces against IPIX, according to some here.

1. Unlimited naked shorting. Alan and Mo said more than 400 millions shares have been naked shorted. The SEC will not do anything because they are in the MM's pocket.

2. BP collusion. BPs are so threatened by Brilacidin taking profits away from their current drugs that they work together to suppress IPIX's stock for years. They hope one of them can be lucky enough to be chosen by Leo for the right of the next Penicillin or Humira, while other BPs are happy to help their competitors out.

3. FDA corruption. The FDA is in BP's pocket to protect their vaccine profits. Leo had to run the majority of trial in Russia, but hopes to be approved by the FDA despite the apparent corruption.

Just like you said, if people truly believe them, why are they still holding the stock? IMO they are simply preemptive strikes. Since they won't blame Leo if their IPIX investment fails, they'll say they are just unlucky to have three powerful forces against them.

If there is no chance of the government taking any action and you seem to state as fact that the sorry state of IPIX is the result of naked shorting, it sounds like the deck is stacked so why would anyone even invest in IPIX at all at this point?