News Focus
News Focus
icon url

SpankThePolitic

10/02/21 3:25 AM

#16323 RE: morg38off #16322

I talked on the phone with OTC Markets service number for retail investors.

Regardless of what you've wrote/copied...the OTC rep stated that this ticker and similar ticker that are now CE / EM must get a MM to sponsor them, essentially trading the ticker for 30 consecutive days. Plus the 211 and other required information. This can take 3 to 6 months.

Plus pay the very expensive filing fee.

So what we've been told is bullsh*t. Their recent filing is bullsh*t.

Who remembers the name of the company that wanted to custo this? SSMonopoly?

Whatever this company told the court about a merger in the works is very likely bullsh*t.

I'd like the name or Twitter or website of the custo company and I'll file a formal complaint with SEC and the jurisdiction of the Court the custo trial occurred to file allegation of contempt of Court via lying to the judge.

Especially if it turns out $MNVN lied about the merger and it turns out to be arms length. That's deceiving the Court which is contempt. Knowingly providing false evidence is a federal crime.

If Joseph is part of this, that is wire fraud. The SEC may be slow and possibly do nothing with such...the particular Court and judge will most definitely be interested in investigating criminal charges.

Joseph oddly accused me that I was "threatening him" when I said that I will file formal complaint. I told him that I was outlining my course of action. I told him I wasn't bluffing.

The time has passed and it's becoming clear there's possibly systemic fraud with these three associated companies.

I suspect there's deeper activities that MNVN didn't want uncovered had SSMonopoly (?) taken over.

I've been holding a very small position since before the custo. Nonetheless, it pains me reading about my fellow investors all possibly being scammed on three interrelated companies.

Thank you in advance for the information of the custo play.