Opinion: Joe Manchin would be foolish to indefinitely hold up the reconciliation bill
Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-W.Va.) on Capitol Hill. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
Opinion by James Hohmann Columnist September 6, 2021 at 8:22 a.m. EDT
Joe Manchin III has a bad case of the slows.
Abraham Lincoln once diagnosed George McClellan with the same problem. The Army general offered excuse after excuse to justify dawdling at key moments in the Civil War. This allowed Confederate commander Robert E. Lee, with a smaller force, to outmaneuver Union troops.
To be sure, Manchin is in the driver’s seat, because Democrats cannot spare a single vote in the 50-50 Senate (with Vice President Harris breaking ties). In other words, he has the power to slim down the bill to his liking and ensure it is fully paid for without accounting gimmicks.
Because it’s not subject to the filibuster, reconciliation is the only realistic way for Democrats to pass significant changes to the social safety net. The measure includes meaningful policy shifts on climate change, education, health care, immigration and other issues.
No question some of what liberals want goes too far — why should rich kids get free community college? — but Democratic leaders and the White House have signaled a willingness to take out many of the more excessive measures.
Manchin also complained in his op-ed that Republicans used reconciliation to pass tax cuts in 2017 that benefited rich investors more than workers, while adding more than $1 trillion to the national debt. Does the senator think the GOP won’t use reconciliation again when they’re back in charge?
And contrary to Manchin’s intimations, this bill can be fully funded. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who can afford no more than three Democratic defections, says the House will only approve something that can get 50 votes in the Senate. A four-page menu .. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-democrats-float-tax-options-pay-biden-s-multi-trillion-n1278470 .. of potential ways to raise revenue as part of the package has been circulating among senators.
If it’s the debt Manchin’s genuinely most concerned about, why doesn’t he reconsider his resistance to raising the corporate tax rate as part of the funding mechanism?
The window for Democrats to govern is closing fast. The rule of thumb in the Capitol has always been that you govern in odd-numbered years and campaign in even-numbered ones. 2022 begins in four months.
Manchin also complained about artificial deadlines in his op-ed, but when does anything get done in Washington without them? Ultimately, liberals and moderates will have to compromise, and Democrats from deep-blue states need to be sensitive to Manchin’s political plight; in November, President Donald Trump’s margin of victory was larger in West Virginia than in every other state except Wyoming. Conversely, Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) — who has also said she won’t vote for a $3.5 trillion bill — owe specifics to their colleagues about their bottom lines.
Lincoln tried to get McClellan to advance against Lee. Finally, the president fired the general. “If General McClellan did not want to use the army, I would like to borrow it,” the 16th president told associates.
If Senator Manchin prevents Democrats from using their majority, Republicans will be happy to borrow it next November.