News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Bubae

09/22/21 4:57 PM

#111764 RE: Sergee10 #111763

Of course it is a conflict of interest but Jason has served as CFO along with everything else since January 2020. The June S1 for raising funds only executes if the company get listed on the NASDAQ. Yet the S1 lays out exactly why they do not qualify.

S1 Information 06/04/2021

https://sec.report/Document/0001493152-21-013614/

"...We do not currently have independent audit or compensation committees. As a result, our sole director has the ability, among other things, to determine his own level of compensation. Until we comply with such corporate governance measures, regardless of whether such compliance is required, the absence of such standards of corporate governance may leave our stockholders without protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interest and similar matters and investors may be reluctant to provide us with funds necessary to expand our operations..."

"Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Pink, which does not have director independence requirements. Our board of directors is currently composed of a single member, Jason Remillard, who does not qualify as an independent director."

Jason Remillard is our President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, and sole Director, positions he has held since November 2017. From November 2017 until May 2019, Mr. Remillard also served as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Remillard has once again assumed the position of Chief Financial Officer as of January 23, 2020.”

We do not have a formal Audit Committee, Nominating Committee, or Compensation Committee. As our business expands, the directors will evaluate the necessity of such committees.”


icon url

Bubae

09/22/21 6:20 PM

#111765 RE: Sergee10 #111763

Another note on this subject that I found in my ATDS file.

Note From Q2 2021 filing

https://sec.report/Document/0001493152-21-018448/

Management’s Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Jason Remillard, as our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. An evaluation was performed of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The evaluation was based on the framework in 2013 Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Based on our evaluation under the criteria set forth in 2013 Internal Control — Integrated Framework, our management concluded that, as of June 30, 2021 our internal control over financial reporting was not effective because of the identification of material weaknesses described as follows:

> We did not have controls designed to validate the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used in the determination of accounting transactions. Accordingly, we believe we have a material weakness because there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement to the interim or annual consolidated financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

> We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act which is applicable to us. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

> We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.