News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HouseofCards

09/17/21 1:32 PM

#184305 RE: justdafactss #184294

Umm...Bruce Patterson did when he said a "clear benefit was seen in the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality at day 28". Reducing death = Saving life. You literally responded to the message that had him saying that.
icon url

SmileyRiley_595

09/17/21 1:38 PM

#184310 RE: justdafactss #184294

Maybe you’re not asking the question the right way… just because the outcome of the answer is not the response you were looking for… I’m not a doctor or a scientist by training, but I have been around enough of them to understand how they communicate.

I’m not sure you will ever have a doctor and/or scientist say that leronlimab is responsible for saving lives any more strongly outside of the parameters of a clinical trial than what was said in this statement to the FDA…

The statement is good enough for me and I’m not particularly concerned if it doesn’t satisfy you…
icon url

CTMedic

09/17/21 1:48 PM

#184311 RE: justdafactss #184294

Jdf,

Would you like me to find the video where Bruce Patterson, in his evaluation of patent responses to Leronlimab noted, “Anecdotes don’t come off life support”?

What medical professional or scientist stated leronlimab saved a life?



Certainly we can agree that Dr.Patterson meant that “anecdotes” represents individual patients to whom Leronlimab was administered and “come off life support” means that these patients lived when they were very near death.

I struggle to find another explanation for Dr Patterson’s statement.
icon url

SF Anony

09/17/21 2:45 PM

#184332 RE: justdafactss #184294

JDF -

Can you point us to an example? That might help ensure we understand exactly what you're looking for (it seems everyone is missing the mark).

For example, do you know of a Doctor stating unequivocally that Remdesivir saved a life?

Or what about Regeneron's antibody cocktail?

Lilly's MAB?