It is hard to identify the gist of the argument here.
"For the record, I’m confident the Brazil trials will NOT yield any approval. Every trial has failed thus far and they will not touch a company that the FDA put on alert and the SEC/DOJ is investigating. They’ll be bankrupt before then anyway. The last round of financing hasn’t been approved, there are not enough authorized shares to sell (MORE DILUTION) and the cash burn is too rapid."
But the gist is this: comments are solely based on speculation using phrases like "will NOT yield, they will not touch, they'll be bankrupt."
Everyone can have an opinion but the distance from the truth to speculation is typically a very long road.
That is why it is good to cite the truth because then, there is no WILL.
If in FACT, the above statements were TRUE, the summary "would" not have a "will" in it.
Try writing a sentence without "will," like this one: "I'm confident the Brazil trials will NOT yield any approval."
My turn: I am confident that the Brazil trials have begun. Upon conclusion, I look forward to their results.