Thanks Chuckles. Spot on. What’s even more concerning is that either way the article was used a s a cover. Amazing how anything posted here regarding the events of 6/30/20 gets so much attention from some…
Devil is in the details… I was able to listen to recording of emerging growth today… interesting to note NP referring to the aforementioned bear raid that no one on this board will soon forget.
BTW… I have it from a very reliable source that various agencies have shown significant interest in the events leading up to the 30th as well as the timeline of events that took place on that particular trading day. From what I’ve heard those agencies don’t take kindly to potential manipulation of that magnitude. The dots are being connected…
After receiving numerous feedback DM's about my chronology of 30Jun20, one thing that I was made aware of and failed to include was that a copy of the Citron report was already being circulated privately amongst different individuals (I have their names now) as early as the 29Jun20.
So, if anyone claims that the report came out PRIOR to 6/30/2020 1:09:41 PM (see Citron report PDF attributes), then you've found a person who was privy to the report before it was published on Citron's website. Or, if someone claimed it was published at 09:30 30Jun20 and did so sometime AFTER 02Jul20, then it was most likely a repeat of the earlier published posts.
I really question who here would see the report and not say anything about it until 4 hours later? Unless......they didn't want anyone that wasn't complicit in the 30Jun20 Bear Raid to be aware of it.
The first post that I found of someone claiming
The Citron Report was out at 9:30 AM Eastern Standard
So, why wasn't the existence of the report shared here around "9:30 AM Eastern Standard" if it came out then. That would certainly be considered BAD and damaging news during the run up to $10.01.
....unless....
I let any readers of this post fill in their own answers....